Wednesday, March 14, 2018

Unclimactic War

There is no question that the goal of the Slaughterhouse-Five is for it to act as an anti-war novel. The narrator himself promises that it will be when he is talking to Mary in chapter one. He makes his promise by saying, "I give you my word of honor: there won't be a part for Frank Sinatra or John Wayne" (Vonnegut 19). What he is saying is that the story isn't going to be about the "glory" of war but instead about the inherent truth. But that raises the question is it possible to write an anti-war book? That question has to be asked because of so many movies and novels that show war as a glorious thing.
But despite that, Vonnegut definitely succeeds in making Slaughterhouse-Five an anti-war novel. To do so he uses several techniques that make the novel incredibly anti-climactic and makes the reader feel uninvolved. He does this by making Billy Pilgrim the epitome of a horrible soldier. He writes it so that Billy is seen as a joke, often because he acts like one. He picks out the most ridiculous jacket, he puts on silver boots from a play and even gets asked if he is trying to make a joke. When combined with the way Billy acts disconnected from everything around him, for example, smiling at the weirdest times, the war-like scenes in the war don't seem exciting. An example of this is the scene where the two scout gets shot. While there is action going on, the tone of the book and the straightforward way it was narrated was able to make the scene not interesting in terms of action.
Another strategy he uses is irony. The book is absolutely full of irony and most of it is built around the same idea: those that are ready for the war and want to live, tend to die, while Billy who is not prepared whatsoever and makes no discernable attempts to stay alive continues to live. Once again a perfect example is the scene when the two scout gets shot. The two scouts who know what they are doing get shot and die but Billy somehow makes it out alive. What this does is show that war isn't a chance to prove yourself at all. You can prepare all you want but when it comes done to it the nature of war is so brutal that it doesn't matter.
Another thing Vonnegut does is using soldiers that don't match the stereotype used in typical war movies and books. Instead he follows up on his promise to Mary and portrays the soldiers as children and other people who don't want to be there. By making the soldiers in the war children like Roland Weary and Werner Gluck, or farmers like the soldiers that found Billy and Roland, or teachers like Edgar Derby, Vonnegut creates absolutely no character that would be played by Frank Sinatra or John Wayne. This shows that wars weren't actually entirely fought by people who were seeking honor and glory and instead shows the hard truth.

8 comments:

  1. I think the scene you talk about with the two soldiers getting shot is very important to Vonnegut's point. Not only does Billy accidentally avoid death when he falls behind and says they should leave him, he also avoids getting killed by Weary. Not only that, but it is the German soldiers who save him when they stumble upon Weary as he is kicking Billy. With all of this going on we also know that Billy will be bombed and shot at in a German city by allied forces and be one of the sole survivors. These events taken together, it is easy for Vonnegut to convince us that it is really random who lives and who dies and that there are no heroes or glory.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The weird exception to that is Robert, Billy's son. He was a hooligan, but he shaped up, joined the military, became a Green Beret, and earned "a Purple Heart and a Silver Star and a Bronze Star with two clusters" (242). We don't actually see him at war, but his experience seems to be much more like a war movie than the other characters.

    -Reed

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree. I think that making the whole war a backdrop really helps. Also, showing the fact that World War II fits the Children's Crusade nickname really helps. A lot of the time, people think of wars as fought by older people who are more mature, but showing the fact that there are young people fighting and it screws up the rest of their lives really shows how bad war can be for even the "winning" side.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like bringing Edgar Derby into it. He is a part we can say is played by John Wayne. Maybe we give him an ugly tie and some Clark Kent glasses before the war, but morally he is the most heroic character. He gives a great speech (maybe more patriotic than a lot of the soldiers are feeling), and refuses to join the Nazis, but even his speech is interrupted by an air raid siren. But even Edgar Derby is disqualified as "hero" because he meets his end for STEALING a teapot (and stealing isn't heroic).

    ReplyDelete
  5. One of the scenes that kind of infantilized Billy and supported Vonnegut's goal of making it an anti-war novel was when Billy was sucking the syrup at the factory that made vitamins for pregnant women. It took away his toughness and the fact that Vonnegut had a lot of elaborate detailed around a kind of minimal aspect might be Vonnegut denying us the gory and glamor of war.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yeah I totally agree. Also he creates characters like Weary who is supposed to represent this John Wayne character in his own retelling of the stories. So Weary when he goes home he will talk heroically about the three musketeers and such. Edgar Derby is described as the first real character, and no one reacts to his 'moving' speech. So there's that. Cool post!

    ReplyDelete
  7. The idea that no one could be played by John Wayne is definitely key to this novel. As I was reading, I kept trying to imagine some of the characters as Mr. Wayne, speaking in his tough voice, but none of them really stuck in my mind. The one that stuck in my mind for longest was Paul Lazzaro, until he was mentioned as "fizzing with rabies". This, I found to very ironic, because it not only is anti-war, but anti-tough guy in general. Lazzaro was never described as a soldier, just as a sort of gangster with connections to killers, and even he has to be anti-climactic.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I feel like the presence of a few characters that would fit in a John Wayne movie are important for making the novel as powerfully anti-war as it is. Edgar Derby is a pretty heroic figure who is fighting for the idealism of patriotism. When he stands up and makes his speech, it highlighted the other American POWs and their inability to stand with Derby. It shows the lack of motivation of these other POWs as well as Derby's inability to have a meaningful impact despite standing for the right reasons and doing the right things. The Englishmen that welcomed Billy's group of POWs ended up rejecting them and showed how little in touch they were with the reality of war. By having a few of these characters Vonnegut shows how wrong it is to glorify war.

    ReplyDelete